What Are Public Policy Violations in New York Wrongful Termination?

Public policy wrongful termination occurs when your employer fires you for reasons that violate clearly established state policies or public interests. In New York, you cannot be terminated for exercising legal rights, refusing to break the law, or engaging in activities that serve important public purposes.

This exception to at-will employment protects workers who stand up for what’s right. Even without a specific statute covering your exact situation, New York courts may find termination wrongful if it contradicts fundamental public policy.

Why Public Policy Protections Matter

New York is an at-will employment state. Employers can generally fire workers for any reason or no reason. However, this power has limits. Courts won’t enforce at-will employment when doing so would harm society’s interests.

Public policy exceptions serve important goals:

Protecting workers who refuse to break the law
Encouraging reporting of illegal or dangerous conduct
Ensuring citizens can exercise civic duties like jury service
Preventing employers from pressuring illegal activity
Supporting workers who assert legal rights
Promoting workplace safety and ethical business practices

Without these protections, employers could force workers into impossible choices: break the law or lose your job. New York’s public policy doctrine prevents this coercion.

Four Categories of Public Policy Wrongful Termination

New York courts recognize four main categories of public policy wrongful termination. Understanding these categories helps you identify whether your firing violated public policy.

Category 1: Refusing to Commit Illegal Acts

Your employer cannot fire you for refusing to break the law. This protection is fundamental to New York’s public policy.

Protected refusals include:

Refusing to falsify records or documents
Declining to commit fraud or perjury
Rejecting demands to violate safety regulations
Refusing to participate in tax evasion schemes
Declining to violate professional licensing requirements
Refusing to manipulate financial reports

The key is that your employer asked you to do something illegal, and you refused. Your termination followed your refusal.

Example: Christina, a licensed pharmacist, refused her employer’s instruction to fill prescriptions without proper authorization. When she insisted on following state pharmacy regulations, the pharmacy fired her. This termination violates public policy because New York has a clear interest in ensuring pharmacists follow licensing laws. Christina has a wrongful termination claim despite at-will employment.

Category 2: Exercising Legal Rights or Performing Civic Duties

New York protects workers who exercise important legal rights or fulfill civic obligations.

Protected activities include:

Serving on jury duty
Voting in elections
Filing workers’ compensation claims
Taking legally mandated leave (family leave, military leave)
Exercising First Amendment rights on matters of public concern
Participating in legal proceedings as a witness
Responding to lawful subpoenas

Courts recognize that society depends on citizens exercising these rights. Employers cannot punish workers for fulfilling civic duties.

Example: Michael received a jury summons for a six-week trial. He notified his employer as required by law. The company fired him, stating they couldn’t afford to have him absent that long. New York Labor Law § 215 explicitly prohibits this termination. Michael has a clear public policy wrongful termination claim based on jury duty protection.

Category 3: Reporting Illegal or Unethical Conduct (Whistleblowing)

New York strongly protects whistleblowers who report violations of law, regulations, or substantial public health and safety dangers.

Protected whistleblowing includes:

Reporting financial fraud or embezzlement
Disclosing safety violations to OSHA or other agencies
Revealing environmental law violations
Reporting healthcare fraud or patient safety issues
Disclosing tax fraud or evasion
Revealing violations of professional regulations

New York Labor Law Section 740 provides specific whistleblower protections with detailed requirements. Common law public policy claims may also exist for reporting that serves public interests.

Example: David, a construction supervisor, reported serious safety violations to OSHA after his employer ignored internal complaints about missing fall protection equipment. The company fired him three weeks after his OSHA report. This termination violates both Labor Law § 740 and common law public policy protecting workers who report safety violations.

Category 4: Opposing Unlawful Discrimination or Harassment

You cannot be fired for opposing discrimination, harassment, or other unlawful employment practices.

Protected opposition includes:

Complaining about discrimination you experienced
Reporting harassment you witnessed
Participating in discrimination investigations
Supporting coworkers’ discrimination complaints
Testifying in discrimination proceedings
Refusing to participate in discriminatory practices

This protection flows from anti-discrimination statutes like NYSHRL and public policy favoring equal employment opportunity.

Example: Rachel complained to HR after witnessing her supervisor make racist comments to a Black coworker. The company fired Rachel two weeks later, claiming “budget cuts,” though no other employees were laid off. This termination appears to violate public policy protecting workers who oppose discrimination.

New York Labor Law Section 215: Statutory Public Policy Protections

New York Labor Law Section 215 creates specific protections for several public policy activities. Violating Section 215 carries penalties and creates clear wrongful termination claims.

Section 215 protects employees from retaliation for:

Jury Duty Service

Employers cannot discharge or penalize employees who receive jury summonses or serve on juries. This is one of New York’s clearest public policy protections.

You must notify your employer when summoned
Employer cannot require you to use vacation time
Small employers (10 or fewer employees) aren’t required to pay wages during service
Larger employers must pay first $40 daily for first three days
Termination for jury service violates Labor Law § 215

Example: Jennifer served on a jury for a two-week criminal trial. Her employer told her to skip jury duty or be fired. When Jennifer explained she was legally required to serve, the company terminated her. This is a clear Labor Law § 215 violation giving Jennifer a strong wrongful termination claim.

Voting Rights

Employers must allow employees time to vote and cannot penalize workers who take voting time.

Employees whose shifts prevent voting must get up to two hours off to vote
Time off must be paid
Employees must request time off 2-10 working days before election
Termination for voting or requesting voting time violates § 215

Testifying in Legal Proceedings

Employees who testify under subpoena or as witnesses in legal proceedings are protected.

Applies to testimony in any legal proceeding
Covers both employee-initiated testimony and subpoenaed testimony
Employer cannot retaliate for truthful testimony
Protection extends to preparing for testimony

Filing Workers’ Compensation Claims

Employees cannot be fired for filing workers’ compensation claims or exercising related rights.

Protection covers initial claim filing
Extends to appeals and hearings
Covers testimony in compensation proceedings
Applies to receiving benefits after award

New York Labor Law Section 740: Whistleblower Protection

Section 740 provides comprehensive whistleblower protection but has specific procedural requirements.

What Section 740 Covers

Section 740 protects employees who disclose or threaten to disclose violations of:

Laws, rules, or regulations
Activities that create substantial and specific danger to public health or safety
Healthcare fraud or patient safety violations (for healthcare workers)

The violation must create substantial risk of harm. Minor technical violations may not qualify.

Section 740 Requirements

To qualify for Section 740 protection, you must follow specific steps:

Step 1: Internal Reporting First

Report the violation to a supervisor first, OR
Provide employer written notice and reasonable opportunity to correct

Step 2: External Reporting (If Internal Fails)

After internal reporting, you may report to government agencies
Or you may report directly to agencies if you fear physical harm
Emergency situations may allow immediate external reporting

Step 3: Reasonable Belief

You must reasonably believe a violation occurred
Good faith belief is sufficient; you don’t need to prove violation
But the belief must be reasonable based on facts

Example: Marcus, an accountant, discovered his employer was systematically evading taxes. He reported this to his supervisor in writing and gave the company 30 days to respond. When the company took no corrective action, Marcus reported the tax fraud to the IRS. The company fired him one month later. Marcus followed Section 740’s procedures and has a protected whistleblower claim.

Exceptions to Section 740

Section 740 doesn’t protect:

Employees who participate in the illegal activity
Disclosures made in bad faith
Frivolous complaints without reasonable basis
Violations of confidentiality required by law (attorney-client privilege, etc.)

Public Policy Violations Not Covered by Specific Statutes

Even without a specific statute, New York courts may recognize public policy wrongful termination if firing violates clear, fundamental policies.

Sources of Public Policy

Courts look to several sources to identify public policy:

Constitutional provisions
Statutes and regulations
Administrative rules and agency guidance
Professional codes of conduct
Prior court decisions
Fundamental societal values

The policy must be clearly established and substantial, not merely personal preference or general notions of fairness.

Example: A nurse refused to participate in a medical procedure she believed violated professional ethical standards and patient safety. The hospital fired her for refusing. While no specific statute covered this exact situation, courts might recognize a public policy claim based on healthcare licensing laws and patient safety regulations.

Limits of Public Policy Exception

Not every termination you disagree with violates public policy. Courts apply this exception narrowly.

Not public policy violations:

Disagreements with business decisions
Personality conflicts with supervisors
General “unfairness” without legal violation
Violation of company policies that aren’t legally mandated
At-will termination for changing company direction

Example: Angela disagreed with her company’s decision to outsource customer service jobs. She vocally opposed this decision. The company fired her for not supporting the new strategy. This doesn’t violate public policy because business reorganization decisions, while potentially unpopular, don’t contradict fundamental legal or societal interests.

New York vs. Federal Public Policy Protections

New York provides similar or stronger public policy protections than federal law in most areas.

Protection Type	New York	Federal Law	Key Differences
Whistleblowing	Labor Law § 740	Various federal statutes	NY requires internal reporting first
Jury Duty	Labor Law § 215	Federal jury duty protection	Similar protections
Voting Rights	Labor Law § 215	No federal employment protection	NY provides explicit protection
Workers’ Comp	Labor Law § 215	Varies by state	NY provides clear protection
Safety Reporting	Common law + § 740	OSHA anti-retaliation	NY § 740 broader
Filing Deadline	2-3 years typically	180-300 days typically	NY much longer

New York’s longer filing deadlines and broader protected categories give workers more opportunities to challenge wrongful termination.

Proving Public Policy Wrongful Termination

To win a public policy wrongful termination claim, you must prove several elements.

Element 1: Clear Public Policy Exists

Identify the specific public policy your termination violated:

Cite specific statutes, regulations, or constitutional provisions
Reference professional codes or licensing requirements
Point to prior court decisions recognizing the policy
Show the policy is fundamental to New York law or society

Vague or general notions of “fairness” aren’t sufficient. The policy must be clearly established.

Element 2: Your Conduct Served the Public Policy

Show your actions advanced the public policy:

You refused to violate law or regulations
You exercised a protected legal right
You reported illegal or dangerous conduct
You opposed unlawful discrimination
You fulfilled civic duties

Your conduct must align with the public policy, not contradict it.

Element 3: Termination Was Caused by Protected Conduct

Prove a connection between your protected activity and termination:

Timing (fired shortly after protected activity)
Employer’s stated reason is pretextual or false
Similar employees not engaging in protected activity weren’t fired
Direct evidence of retaliatory motive
Pattern of negative treatment after protected activity

Circumstantial evidence is often sufficient. Suspicious timing combined with false reasons can prove causation.

Element 4: No Other Legitimate Reason for Termination

Address any legitimate reasons the employer claims:

Show employer’s stated reason is false or pretextual
Demonstrate you weren’t violating performance standards
Prove other employees with similar issues weren’t fired
Show evidence contradicting employer’s claims

Employers often fabricate performance issues to hide illegal motives. Documentation of good performance helps defeat these pretexts.

Real-World Public Policy Violation Scenarios

Scenario 1: Refusing to Falsify Records

Elena worked as an accountant. Her supervisor instructed her to backdate invoices to inflate quarterly earnings. Elena refused, explaining this would constitute fraud. The company fired her the following week.

Legal analysis: Elena’s termination violates public policy against fraud and financial misconduct. New York has strong policies requiring accurate financial reporting. Elena’s refusal to commit fraud is protected conduct, and her firing shortly after refusal suggests causation.

Scenario 2: Reporting Safety Violations

Carlos, a factory worker, reported missing machine guards to OSHA after his employer ignored internal safety complaints. Two weeks after the OSHA inspection, the company terminated Carlos, claiming his “attitude was negative.”

Legal analysis: Carlos has claims under both Labor Law § 740 and common law public policy. New York strongly protects workplace safety reporting. The timing and vague termination reason suggest retaliation for protected whistleblowing.

Scenario 3: Legitimate Performance-Based Termination

Michelle had received multiple written warnings for tardiness and missing deadlines over six months. After her fourth written warning, the company terminated her. Michelle had also filed a harassment complaint three months earlier.

Legal analysis: This is likely legitimate termination, not public policy violation. The employer documented performance issues over an extended period before and after the harassment complaint. Unless Michelle can show the performance documentation was fabricated to hide retaliation, this appears to be lawful termination for genuine performance problems.

What to Do If You’re Fired for Public Policy Violations

Document Everything Before and After Termination

Create comprehensive records:

Written description of illegal activity you refused or reported
Dates, times, and witnesses to conversations
Emails, texts, or documents showing employer’s requests
Your complaints or reports (with dates filed)
Employer’s response or lack of response
Termination notice and stated reasons

Documentation proves your version of events and defeats employer claims of different motivations.

Preserve Evidence of the Underlying Violation

Keep evidence of the original violation:

Documents showing illegal activity
Photos of safety violations
Copies of falsified records or reports
Communications about illegal activities
Witness contact information

This evidence proves your report or refusal was based on actual violations, not fabricated complaints.

Report Through Proper Channels

Follow required reporting procedures:

Make internal complaints in writing when possible
Use company grievance procedures if available
For Section 740 claims, follow internal reporting requirements first
Report to appropriate government agencies
Keep proof of all reports filed

Proper reporting strengthens claims and may be required for certain protections.

File Government Complaints If Applicable

Consider filing with relevant agencies:

NYSDHR for discrimination-related public policy claims
Department of Labor for wage, hour, or safety issues
OSHA for workplace safety violations
Professional licensing boards for violations of professional standards
Law enforcement for fraud or criminal activity

Agency investigations create official records supporting your claims.

Consult an Employment Attorney Immediately

Get legal advice quickly:

Attorneys identify all applicable protections and deadlines
Lawyers evaluate strength of public policy claims
Attorneys gather and preserve evidence strategically
Legal counsel navigates complex procedural requirements
Lawyers negotiate settlements or file lawsuits

Many employment attorneys offer free consultations and work on contingency fees.

Common Questions About Public Policy Wrongful Termination

Do I need a specific law protecting my exact situation?

Not always. While specific statutes like Labor Law § 215 or § 740 provide clear protections, courts may also recognize common law public policy claims based on constitutional provisions, regulations, or fundamental societal values. However, specific statutory protections are easier to prove than common law claims.

What if my employer claims I was fired for performance issues?

This is the most common employer defense. You must show the stated reason is pretextual (false or exaggerated). Evidence includes: timing of termination after protected activity, positive prior reviews, similar employees not being fired, documentation contradicting performance claims, or direct evidence of retaliatory motive.

Can I be fired for reporting violations that turned out to be wrong?

Not if you had a reasonable, good-faith belief violations occurred. You don’t need to prove actual violations occurred. Your belief must be reasonable based on facts you knew, but it doesn’t need to be correct. However, knowingly false reports aren’t protected.

How long do I have to file a public policy wrongful termination claim?

It depends on the claim type. Labor Law § 740 whistleblower claims have a two-year statute of limitations. Common law wrongful discharge claims typically have three years. Some claims may have longer periods. Consult an attorney immediately because missing deadlines can permanently bar valid claims.

What damages can I recover for public policy wrongful termination?

Damages typically include back pay (lost wages from termination to judgment), front pay (future lost earnings), lost benefits, emotional distress, and sometimes punitive damages. Under Labor Law § 740, you may also recover attorney fees, costs, and reinstatement. See wrongful termination damages for details.

Do I have to report internally before going to government agencies?

For Labor Law § 740 whistleblower claims, yes, you generally must report internally first and give the employer reasonable time to correct the violation. Exceptions exist for immediate dangers or if you reasonably fear physical harm. Other public policy claims may not require internal reporting first. Consult an attorney about specific requirements.

Legal Disclaimer

This article provides general information about public policy wrongful termination in New York and should not be construed as legal advice. Employment law is complex and fact-specific. The information presented here may not apply to your specific situation. Deadlines, laws, and regulations change over time.

If you believe you were wrongfully terminated for public policy violations, consult with a qualified New York employment attorney who can evaluate your individual circumstances and provide personalized legal advice. Nothing in this article creates an attorney-client relationship.

Sources:

New York Labor Law Section 215 (jury duty, voting, workers’ compensation protection)
New York Labor Law Section 740 (whistleblower protection)
Wieder v. Skala, 80 N.Y.2d 628 (1992) (attorney whistleblower public policy case)
Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 69 N.Y.2d 329 (1987) (public policy wrongful discharge)
New York State Department of Labor, labor.ny.gov
New York State Division of Human Rights, dhr.ny.gov

FREE Evaluation

Helpful Resources

Related Articles

Recent Blog Posts